Skip to main content

The Great SBMM Debate Infects The ‘Call Of Duty: Black Ops Cold War’ Alpha

 Cold War

ATVI

The Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War Alpha is drawing to an end today, and there has been one dominant point of contention among players and pros alike during the early test run here.

It’s less about how the game plays with its new guns and skills and maps and such, but rather a familiar debate, Skill-Based Matchmaking (SBMM) versus Connection-based Matchmaking (CBMM).

The idea is that even for this early Alpha test, Call of Duty had turned on SBMM which resulted in a number of players, high profile pros especially, complaining about how matches felt.

SBMM takes into account player skill and tries to match you with other players who are as good or as bad as you. This is supposed to result in more even games and less of one team crushing the other, or getting crushed.

But critics of SBMM say that it makes for too many “sweaty” games when top tier players are matched only against others of similar sky-high skill. The counter to this is CBMM, which prioritizes connection. That means less lag but more potentially uneven teams.

Cold War

ATVI

This topic is contentious not just in Call of Duty, but in pretty much all competitive online multiplayer games. In the Destiny community, we’ve been having this debate for years, which Bungie recently removing SBMM from almost all modes after a lot of pushback from high profile players. During this Cold War debate, I read a pretty fascinating argument against this push for CBMM over SBMM from pro fighting game player TSM Leffen, who frames it as pro streamers who are just looking for easier matches that they can extract more content and highlight reels out of as they stomp on worse players:

“watching people argue that FPS players should in fact, not play people who are as good as them, but people worse than them so they can stroke their ego is so f***ng pathetic.

what's the joy in beating people up who play once every two weeks if you're playing this s*** full time

its very obviously that content creators are trying to trick their audience that you should in fact, not be okay with a system that makes for fair matches and it should instead become favor them so they can make content easier.

it's like watching poor people vote for trump

and yeah, if your game sucks when multiple people are good, then guess what, the game wasn't great to begin with. just smurf or somes***.

oh and don't come at me with the "its just casual xD"

even casuals care about even matches.”

But, other players rallied against Leffen, saying that CBMM isn’t as bad as he claims and coming from a fighting game perspective, it’s different. The metaphor was that in team-based shooters CBMM is like a pickup basketball game with players of all skill levels, whereas a fighting game would be more like tennis, a 1v1 where the skill gap is way, way more easily felt.

Destiny

Bungie

At the risk of being crucified by one side or another, I have generally been okay with SBMM in most circumstances, but a recent argument I’ve heard is one I find compelling. That SBMM should be paired with a ranking system so you can at least see where you are in the skill ranks, rather than just playing in hard matches every single game.

I do think content creators are biased toward preferring CBMM over SBMM because I mean, if you’re at the top of the food chain in terms of skill, you would rather be showing off by dominating lower skilled players rather than competing with others also at the extreme top of the game. Like I get the appeal of that, it makes sense, and yet I think there’s something dishonest about the phrasing of “we just want some chill games” that you hear from many creators which really does often just translate to “we want some 40 kill matches on stream to cut together into a YouTube highlight video.” Casual players also want “chill games,” but being destroyed by being at the other end of CBMM does not allow for that. 

We’ll see how things play out when Cold War launches, or in future betas before that, I suppose. But it was the hot topic of the weekend, and a debate that will not be ending across any of these games any time soon.

Update: And here’s Treyarch confirming that all past CODs have SBMM in casual playlists, reinforcing that a lot of this is also kind of just a perception issue:

Follow me on Twitter, YouTube and Instagram. Pick up my sci-fi novels Herokiller and Herokiller 2, and read my first series, The Earthborn Trilogy, which is also on audiobook.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

PUBG update 8.3 patch notes adds ferries, jammer packs, and more

  Hop aboard the ferry before it departs in PUBG's 8.3 update. We have the full patch notes for you to read during your ride. One wouldn't imagine that a barge would be the safest place to sit during a PUBG session, but players are about to get that option with the upcoming 8.3 update. PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds is getting some substantial additions with its next patch and players are getting a first look with Wednesday's patch notes. Here are the major patch note bullet points, taken from the PUBG website: Four Ferries have been added to Erangel Ferries allow players to board and travel via two set routes between the Erangel Mainland and Sosnovka Island Each route has two Ferries Each Ferry will depart from the docks with the first phase of the Blue Zone Once arriving at a dock, ferries will stay docked for approximately 20 seconds before taking to the sea en route to their destination Ferries will sound a horn 7 secs prior to arrival and departure. Hop aboard! Ferr...

Will PUBG remain forever banned in India?

  Ever since the government took down Chinese apps, comprising the much beloved PUBG over security reasons, the multiplayer game's fans have been wondering if the biggest video game in India will ever make a comeback. The Union Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MEITY) had on September 2 banned 59 more apps including PUBG, in addition to 165 mobile applications banned on two occasions earlier. The ministry in a stern notice said that the said apps were banned in the view of the "emergent nature of threats" as they were engaged in activities which were "prejudicial" to sovereignty, defence and security of the country. Also Read: Mukesh Ambani's Reliance to buy PUBG? Here's what we know so far But the big question is whether the ban on these apps, PUBG specifically, is permanent or a stop-gap arrangement? PUBG move after ban in India Following its ban from the Indian market, PUBG Corp, the parent company of PUBG Mobile, announced that Tenc...

GAME ON: Protect allies and find killers in whodunit game ‘Among Us’

  Flying under the radar since 2018, the social-deduction party game "Among Us" has suddenly seen a surge of interest from video game streamers. In the months after its release, "Among Us" never had more than 50 simultaneous players. Thanks to a dedicated developer team pushing out updates, the game started to see serious traction recently, and in the past month, its peak concurrent users topped 1.5 million. That's a pretty amazing feat for a 2-year-old, extremely inexpensive game. If you've ever played party games such as Werewolf or Mafia (or sometimes called Vampire) with friends, then you have the gist of what "Among Us" is about. The game features a group of four to 10 players in a space-theme setting. Each game, one to three players are "Impostors" and the rest are "Crewmates." It's the Impostors' job to stealthily kill Crewmates, and the Crewmates' job to identify and eliminate the Imposters hiding among them....